Montagne Ste Victoire

July 11, 2008

Victoire!

Victoire!

Dear Friends,

As many of you know, I was born in Marseille, France, and many of my childhood summers were spent enjoying Provence, with family and friends, from perches in cherry trees overlooking vineyards, swimming in the turquoise waters of Cassis’ calanques or picknicking in the dappled shade of the plane trees at Le Tholonet.

When I return to Provence now, as a mother, my mission is to share my affection for this place with my children and hope they will fall in love in turn. When my son Nicholas was 7, we made our first attempt to climb Provence’s peak of Cezanne renown–Montagne Ste Victoire–from the south side, early one morning. It was not to be, as poor Nick’s little legs were not up to the challenge and the scree soon sent him sliding down several feet in a cloud of gravely dust. Another time, I said, wiping away the blood from his scraped knees and the tears from his reddened cheeks.

That time finally came last week– after 7 years of anticipation. We have tried three times since the first over the years, but have been thwarted by weather or threat of forest fires, when the park service closes down the whole mountain.

We set out from Vauvenargues, a peaceful hamlet folded into a valleyside and dominated by Picasso’s castle and its extensive lands. We numbered six: my two children (Nick and Sasha), my husband Stuart, my French nephew Cedric, his father Didier and myself.

The trail was called Chemin des Venturiers and is classified as “easy.”  When we had trouble finding it at first, we interrupted the gardening of a lovely elderly lady in a sun hat and shell necklace to ask for directions. In her lilting Provencal accent, she assured us we were very lost and redirected us, informing us warmly that the hike takes only an hour and a half to the top and “you’ll be protected by the shade of the pine trees most of the way.” Lovely!

The merciful shade was short-lived. As we started to ascend, we noticed tracks of forest cleared, evidently for fire management purposes. The smell of hot pinewood perfumed the area, and our temperature rose as we passed through.

The trail was wide (5 to 10 feet) and for the first hour presents a substantial pitch, made all the more challenging by loose gravel and large stones. In three or four places, the slope is actually paved with rough concrete, marking particularly steep areas where ascent (and descent) was perhaps deemed too tricky if one’s footing was not on firmer ground.

The heat was dry and unforgiving. We stopped frequently to rehydrate and catch our breath. Those pines provided only partial shade on such a wide path. The smells of Provence sweetened the air–the pines mixed with rosemary, thyme, yellow broom, thistles, and a few hardy red poppies.

Three quarters of the way up, we lost two of our party. Stuart had broken his toe the day before playing soccer with his nephew and his discomfort had soared, and Didier may have been having bad memories of his time in French military service when a long hike without enough water cost him a kidney. Or he was simply showing solidarity to my injured husband. They decided to wait for us to return.

I gave the rest of the party the option to summit or remain, and was delighted to have all children vote to proceed without hesitation. En avant tous!

Twenty minutes more of a steep ascent on gravelly wide paths, now and then with the pines parting to reveal sweeping views of Vauvenargues and the ridge on its north side. Then a change of pace–the path widens to a clearing with a bench (where someone has written “2 heures de marche!” as if in warning that the widely held claim of an hour and a half is not accurate).

From here we step up into a narrow path through brush and white rocks. The children quicken their pace. Sasha’s spindly legs fly ahead: she’s giddy with the relative ease of the new path. We spy the cross atop Ste Victoire. It seems far and high-but within reach somehow.

Soon we are on easy switchbacks up the mountain, clear from obstruction, with views that make even monosyllabic Nick, a normal teenage boy, stop, stare, and utter quietly “wow.” To the west now we can see the Barrage de Bimont, a large reservoir that serves the area–baby blue water in a parched landscape.

Back and forth across the mountainside we go, gauging our progress by the increasing size of the cross above us. Nick takes shortcuts, scrambling and jumping ahead of Cedric, then Sasha.

We arrive at the old priory, where an ancient olive tree grove casts welcome shade over its stone cool entrance. The place is closed and a hardhat area and piles of stone tell a tale of renovation in progress. Another group of three (French) hikers is resting and sharing some bread and saucisson. They compliment us on our pace–it’s true, we had hit a second wind on those open-air switchbacks! They haven’t been to the cross yet-they tell us they are “restauring” themselves first, as the French say, revealing the origin of the word “restaurant.”

I check in on my young hikers–we have to pace ourselves on water. We are running low. They all vote for not stopping. They want to reach the cross before any “restauration” takes place. Off we go!

Around the priory, the hike becomes a rock scramble. Again, rather than discouraging the troops, we’re invigorated by the challenge and what lies ahead. Large white rocks provide uneven, unintentional “pele mele” high steps to the top platform and its prize: the cross of Sainte Victoire.

Nick is the first to reach it and throws his arms up in victory, singing the “Rocky” theme song, as the wind whips up the sheer rock of the south side and buffets his hair. Sasha gazes in awe over the landscape around us, staying safely away from the precipice. Surprisingly, we have cell phone reception (which we hadn’t for most of the way), and Cedric makes a call to his father and hour away beneath us to pronounce the mission accomplished.

The victory of Sainte Victoire is particularly sweet to me. The mountain has long been a familiar, yet distant, vision in my life, resurrected every time I stood before a Cezanne painting. Now I feel a certain intimacy with this massive rock, a closeness that was not there before. Most importantly, I have shared her beauty, her colors, and her smells with my children. This time we leave France with a little Provence in our pockets.

Kate Simpson
President
Academic Travel Abroad

Bookmark and Share


NAFSA 2008

June 9, 2008

Hello, Friends of ATA!

It’s been a while since I last posted anything.  I received wise advice–don’t blog unless you have something to say.  Since my return from Harvard, I have been immersed in day to day management, while applying some strategic lessons learned from HBS to better lead the company toward a strong and bright future.  And while these steps may be exciting to me and my colleagues, I question their interest to others, so I have spared you any hum-drum blogging.

Then an event took place that inspired me.  I attended the annual NAFSA conference here in Washington, D.C.–and thought it was worthy of note. NAFSA (formerly the National Association of Foreign Student Advisors, and now simply an obsolete acronym) is the association that brings together those in the university setting who receive and counsel foreign students and those who are involved in sending American students abroad for study.  Here is their official mission statement:

NAFSA serves international educators and their institutions and organizations by setting standards of good practice, providing training and professional development opportunities, providing networking opportunities, and advocating for international education.

I attended NAFSA as part of ATA’s CET Academic Programs (www.cetacademicprograms.com) team.  CET Academic Programs is ATA’s study abroad division, which represents about 30% of ATA’s total business.  (We acquired CET in 1993 and have grown the program by 10 fold since then.) We (CET) had a booth and a larger than usual presence, as NAFSA is not usually in our hometown.

Sessions featured varied topics, ranging from Policymaking for International Education and Coming Out Across Borders (Outcomes of GLBT Study Abroad Experiences) to Helicopter Parents and an Author Series featuring well-known writers on international experiences. In all, the conference was to have over 9,000 in attendance from the U.S. and over 100 countries and took place in the D.C. Convention Center. The parade of booths rivaled World Travel Mart in London with Spain’s presence being the most impressive in size.

While most conference attendees might skip the plenary sessions, I decided that it might be worth checking out, given that Judy Woodruff, once of my favorite journalists, was moderating. I was right. It was one of the most worthwhile sessions of the day. In addition to Judy Woodruff, the following individuals participated, representing a broad array of perspectives, and explored the conduct and goals of public diplomacy, with an emphasis on the vital role of international education:

  • Hisham Melhem, Washington Bureau Chief, Al-Arabiya
  • Keith Reinhard, Business for Diplomatic Action
  • Patricia de Stacy Harrison, Corporation for Public Broadcasting
  • Shashi Tharoor, former Under-Secretary-General, UN
  • The panelists discussed topics such as the forms and outcomes of public diplomacy used by the United States in the last 60 years; the relationships between foreign policy and public diplomacy during that period; and the impact international businesses has had on cross-cultural understanding and the creation of the “flat world.”  Questions like “What role does international education play in building understanding across cultures and national boundaries?” and “What is the future of public diplomacy in the 21st century?” were asked.

    The debate was heated.  Shash Tharoor presented eloquently on his position, speaking on the image and brand of the U.S. abroad and how it needs to change.  Hisham Melhem objected strenuously to the term “brand” with regard to a country’s image, as it implied it was all about “spin.” (He admitted he was not a marketer or business person, but trained in philosophy).  He emphasized that, in order to change its image, the U.S. needed to take action and let its actions speak for themselves.  This was not a case where “re-branding” and “spin” would be effective, he contended.

    Keith Reinhard, a successful business man, has established a nonpartisan, nonprofit organization dedicated to reversing the decline in America’s standing in the world and improving relations between Americans and people from other cultures (http://www.businessfordiplomaticaction.com). Mr. Reinhardt cited the Pew Global Attitudes Project released in June 2006.  In this document, 15 nations were surveyed to gauge their attitude to the U.S.  Though anti-Americanism had abated somewhat in 2005 as a result of the aid offered up by Americans to Tsunami victims and elsewhere, our ranking dropped significantly in most of the countries surveyed.  For example, since 2000, Great Britain’s view of the U.S. went from an 83% favorable rating to 55%, while Indonesia (a largely Muslim country) went from a 75% to 30% favorable rating.  As Mr. Reinhard’s website states:

    While it is true that much resentment of our country currently centers on our foreign policy, much does not. Other root causes include the perception that we are arrogant and insensitive as a people, that our culture has become all-pervasive, and that the global business expansion on the part of U.S. companies has been exploitive.

    I think that one of the best lessons for those in attendance was provided by Shashi Tharoor, former Under-Secretary-General of the UN. He offered the following anecdote to illustrate the importance of cultural perspective.

    An American farmer visits a farmer in India. The American asks his Indian counterpart where the boundaries of his farm lie.  The Indian farmer proudly points to the river visible not too far in the distance–”that’s my western boundary, and that” he says pointing to the trees nearby, ” is my eastern boundary.” He completes the demarkation of the farm by indicating the farmhouse behind them and the shed out in the distance ahead of them.  When done, the Indian farmer asks the American, “And how big is your farm?”  The American says, “Well, I get on my tractor and I go two and a half hours east and I reach the eastern boundary. Then I turn right and drive another three hours to the south and hit my southern border, and I turn right again and ride my tractor another two and a half hours north to my northern boundary, and finally I turn right again and drive another 3 hours back to the farmhouse. Just in time for dinner!”

    The Indian farmer nods his head knowingly and says “I used to have a tractor like that.”

    With (very) warm regards from steamy Washington, D.C.,

    Kate Simpson

    President, Academic Travel Abroad

    Bookmark and Share


    Follow

    Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.